- #EMULATIONSTATION WITH RETROARCH WINDOWS MAC OSX#
- #EMULATIONSTATION WITH RETROARCH WINDOWS SERIAL#
- #EMULATIONSTATION WITH RETROARCH WINDOWS DRIVER#
- #EMULATIONSTATION WITH RETROARCH WINDOWS SOFTWARE#
I tried hitting it as fast as possible, at a slow steady pace etc. I tried 3 times and no matter what I did, it wouldn't fill up. The goal is to mash the X button to fill up the blue bar to stop the elevator from falling. This is the game in case you're interested.Į (14.8 KiB) Viewed 23920 times I was playing the game Incredible Crisis on PS1 through RetroPie on Raspberry Pi 4. the games themselves are essentially unplayable and anyone playing games through emulation doesn't value their time. Being able to 2x or 10x the resolution of games from the PS1 gen is amazing, but seriously. However, with emulation of old console games they generally don't have graphics options so tweaking things has more potential to break things.Īnyway, it's not really about the graphics options. That statement sounds like it might be relevant to PC gaming in general compared to console gaming, and you may have a point, but with PC, you generally tweak within a spec and the games are designed to be tweaked from the outset, with many options. There is far too much tinkering and tweaking to get things looking just right and suiting the capabilities of your hardware. If you are able to author a very useful improvement with a minimum of changes, we might merge your changes.Basically, it's because you never know what you're going to get. It should be fairly easy given the scope of the project. We encourage you to fork Ludo and add the feature yourself. The answer is likely to be no, as we're trying to keep the code small, so only bugfixes are really welcome. Ludo's scanner faster for this reason and because it leverages goroutines.
#EMULATIONSTATION WITH RETROARCH WINDOWS SERIAL#
No, the scanner logic is basically the same and Ludo supports even less ROM formats.ĬDs are scanned based on file name instead of serial number. Does Ludo offer a better scanning method compared to RetroArch?
#EMULATIONSTATION WITH RETROARCH WINDOWS DRIVER#
Implementing Ludo as a menu driver of RetroArch would solve none of these core issues.įor now, Ludo distinguishes itself from RetroArch by offering less features and focusing on a more easy to use interface.
RetroArch is an extremely active project and has a growing codebase that makes it harder to reach stability.Īlso, RetroArch is a very powerful and sophisticated frontend, and one of the common criticisms is that it exposes too many configuration options for the average retro gamer. It is also important to not introduce changes at a high rate.
#EMULATIONSTATION WITH RETROARCH WINDOWS SOFTWARE#
To keep software stable on a number of different platforms, it is important to keep a small codebase with a good test coverage. Why not implement Ludo as a menu driver in RetroArch? It definitely shares a lot of the same core values. It also shares some of the same developers, as kivutar is an important contributor of the libretro team, and all the people who provided help have also been members of the Libretro community. Same cores, similar UI patterns, joypad driven UI, same game thumbnails, mostly the same game database, same terminology. Like RetroArch, Ludo is a libretro frontend, so the way of communicating with the emulators is the same. The cores are packaged in the frontend so no additional step is required to launch a game. For example we support less cores, and choose cores for the user.
#EMULATIONSTATION WITH RETROARCH WINDOWS MAC OSX#
Ludo will stay smaller than RetroArch by only implementing the core features and by targeting less platforms.īy not adding advanced functionalities, we aim to deliver a stable frontend for beginner users on Windows, Mac OSX and Linux. Frequently Asked Questions How is Ludo different from RetroArch?
0 kommentar(er)
